Categories: Litigation

Federal Judge Strikes Down County Ordinance Banning Hydraulic Fracturing

On January 19, 2015, in a 199-page summary judgment opinion in SWEPI, LP v. Mora County, New Mexico (CIV 14-0035 JB/SCY), New Mexico U.S. District Court Judge James Browning declared that a 2013 Mora County ordinance banning corporate oil and gas drilling and hydraulic fracturing unconstitutional and in violation of the corporate-plaintiff developer’s property rights and the Supremacy Clause under the U.S. Constitution. The law, titled the Mora County Community Water Rights and Local Self-Government Ordinance, banned such activity within a substantially rural county approximately 100 miles northeast of Santa Fe. The Plaintiff is a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell PLC.

Although subject to review by the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, this federal court’s decision is a setback for local control activists. Judge Browning found that the Ordinance expressly attempted to circumvent corporate rights protected by federal law. In fact, the Ordinance declared that companies “shall not have the rights of ‘persons’ afforded by the United States and New Mexico Constitutions,” including First Amendment rights and due process. Judge Browning noted that the “Defendants’ argument that corporations should not be granted constitutional rights, or that corporate rights should be subservient to people’s rights, are arguments that are best made before the Supreme Court — the only court that can overrule Supreme Court precedent — rather than a district court.” Although the federal court did not find Plaintiff’s “takings” claim to be ripe because Plaintiff had not sought just compensation through a state inverse condemnation action, Judge Browning further found the Ordinance violative of, and impliedly preempted by state law since it would create waste and prohibit activity that New Mexico law allows.
Although state courts in New York and Pennsylvania have ruled in favor of some level of local government control over oil and gas development, decisions rejecting similar oil and gas activity bans were issued in 2014 by Boulder District Court Judge D.D. Mallard, which are now at issue in the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Published by
Kathryn Haight

Recent Posts

Welborn’s Litigation Team Prevails in Proving Breach of Contract in 2-Month Trial

The Welborn litigation team of Sam Bacon, Brian Tooley, David Hrovat, and Anthony Roeber prevailed…

3 weeks ago

Who owns the minerals under a right-of-way?

On December 12, 2023, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Great Northern Properties…

4 months ago

Landowners Next to Roads Get Big Win

On September 15, 2022, the Colorado Court of Appeals resolved a question that has circulated…

2 years ago

The Colorado Power Pathway Connecting Coloradans to Renewable Energy

On June 2, 2022, the Colorado Power Pathway (the “Pathway”) was approved by the Colorado…

2 years ago

Reading Between the Lines

READING BETWEEN THE LINES: IS NOTICE REQUIRED PRIOR TO RECORDING AN OIL AND GAS LIEN?[1]…

3 years ago

North Dakota Supreme Court says “stop” to class action royalty litigation

On May 20, 2021, the North Dakota Supreme Court held that the following “free of…

3 years ago