Categories: Oil & Gas

State vs Local Control of Oil and Gas Activity: Ohio

On February 17, 2015, in State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp. (Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-485), the Ohio Supreme Court ruled, in a 4-3 decision, that Munroe Falls, a suburb or Akron, could not use local zoning laws to supersede or override the state of Ohio’s regulatory scheme for oil and gas activity. Recognizing that Ohio law “preserves certain powers for local governments, it gives state government ‘sole and exclusive authority’ to regulate the permitting, location, and spacing of oil and gas wells and production operations within the state.” The Ohio Supreme Court rejected the argument that the Home Rule Amendment to the Ohio Constitution grants to the city of Munroe Falls the power to enforce its own permitting scheme on top of the state system and does not allow a municipality to block drilling activities otherwise permitted by the state.

In that case, Beck Energy had obtained a state-issued permit in 2011 to drill a traditional well on private property in Munroe Falls. The city’s resulting suit claimed that Beck Energy had illegally sidestepped local ordinances, rendering its conduct illegal. The Ohio Supreme Court majority rejected Munroe Falls’ claim and held that a town cannot enforce oil and gas drilling regulations that conflict with statewide law and, hence, Munroe Falls had exceeded the limits of Ohio’s Home Rule Amendment. In Justice Terrence O’Donnell’s special concurrence he emphasized that while he agreed with the result, the scope of the majority’s decision was limited, stating: “it remains to be decided whether the General Assembly intended to wholly supplant all local zoning ordinances limiting land uses to certain zoning districts without regulating the details of oil and gas drilling” addressed in state law.

Even though courts in New York and Pennsylvania have ruled in favor of some level of local government control over oil and gas development, decisions rejecting similar local oil and gas activity bans were issued in New Mexico in 2015 by U.S. District Judge James Browning and in 2014 by Boulder District Court Judge D.D. Mallard (now at issue in the Colorado Court of Appeals).

Published by
Kathryn Haight

Recent Posts

Welborn’s Litigation Team Prevails in Proving Breach of Contract in 2-Month Trial

The Welborn litigation team of Sam Bacon, Brian Tooley, David Hrovat, and Anthony Roeber prevailed…

2 weeks ago

Who owns the minerals under a right-of-way?

On December 12, 2023, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Great Northern Properties…

4 months ago

Landowners Next to Roads Get Big Win

On September 15, 2022, the Colorado Court of Appeals resolved a question that has circulated…

2 years ago

The Colorado Power Pathway Connecting Coloradans to Renewable Energy

On June 2, 2022, the Colorado Power Pathway (the “Pathway”) was approved by the Colorado…

2 years ago

Reading Between the Lines

READING BETWEEN THE LINES: IS NOTICE REQUIRED PRIOR TO RECORDING AN OIL AND GAS LIEN?[1]…

3 years ago

North Dakota Supreme Court says “stop” to class action royalty litigation

On May 20, 2021, the North Dakota Supreme Court held that the following “free of…

3 years ago