Categories: Property Rights

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Consider Colorado Rancher’s Attempt to Bar Oil Drillers from Ranch

On April 27, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari to review a Colorado rancher’s attempt to prevent oil development and related access on his ranch. Petitioner Stull Ranches had requested that the high court review and reverse a 2014 decision of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided in favor of the federal mineral lessee, Entek GRB, which allowed Entek reasonable surface access to drill for oil and to use a road to access another unitized Entek well.

The federal mineral rights at issue had been reserved by and for the federal government pursuant to the Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916 [Pub.L. No. 64–290, 39 Stat. 862 (codified at 43 U.S.C. §§ 291–301)] and, pursuant thereto, the land-grant surface successor acquired its real property interests subject to the government’s reservation of mineral rights and interests, which includes: “(1) the right to enter and use so much of the surface as might be ‘reasonably incident’ to the exploration and removal of mineral deposits, and (2) the right to enact future laws and regulations regarding the ‘disposal’ of the mineral estate.” Entek GRB, LLC v. Stull Ranches, LLC, 763 F.3d 1252, 1254 (10th Cir. 2014), cert. denied sub nom. Stull Ranches, LCC v. Entek GRB, LCC, No. 14-1007, 2015 WL 730880 (U.S. Apr. 27, 2015). According to the 10th Circuit, this “second right … sweeps broadly when it places the minerals at the government’s ‘disposal,’ signifying not just the government’s power to ‘bestow[ ]’ or ‘assign[ ]’ the minerals, but also a power to ‘manage[ ],’ ‘make use of,’ and ‘deal with [them] as [it] pleases.'” Id. (Citation omitted.) The legal framework for disposition is that provided by the 1920 Mineral Leasing Act [Pub.L. No. 66–146, 41 Stat. 437 (codified in scattered sections of 30 U.S.C.)] as amended, which entitles the federal lessee the reasonable right to access and explore the mineral estate, a statutory right to unitize, and a reasonable right to access unitized wells and minerals.

Published by
Kathryn Haight

Recent Posts

Welborn’s Litigation Team Prevails in Proving Breach of Contract in 2-Month Trial

The Welborn litigation team of Sam Bacon, Brian Tooley, David Hrovat, and Anthony Roeber prevailed…

3 weeks ago

Who owns the minerals under a right-of-way?

On December 12, 2023, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Great Northern Properties…

4 months ago

Landowners Next to Roads Get Big Win

On September 15, 2022, the Colorado Court of Appeals resolved a question that has circulated…

2 years ago

The Colorado Power Pathway Connecting Coloradans to Renewable Energy

On June 2, 2022, the Colorado Power Pathway (the “Pathway”) was approved by the Colorado…

2 years ago

Reading Between the Lines

READING BETWEEN THE LINES: IS NOTICE REQUIRED PRIOR TO RECORDING AN OIL AND GAS LIEN?[1]…

3 years ago

North Dakota Supreme Court says “stop” to class action royalty litigation

On May 20, 2021, the North Dakota Supreme Court held that the following “free of…

3 years ago